In the justice systems I’m familiar with, the lawyers are not typically allowed to protest while the other lawyer is questioning a witness. So what will lawyers in the USA typically protest against, for example when the opposite party is questioning a witness?

What do you think motivates lawyers to do pro bono work?

Should pro bono work be mandatory for law students and/or lawyers?

Why is it a response of lawyers, when they hear about abusive, corrupt acts of government officials, to advise those harmed by the corrupt government officials to hire a lawyer?

Some things should be dealt with as a crime, not as a lawsuit. Or don’t lawyers care, especially if it generates fees they can collect from those harmed by the corruption.?

And do they really think that such lawsuits would accomplish much in a locality where corruption is widespread, even accepted as part of the culture? How many of the local judges could be trusted in such a situation?